imtoken will never ask for your seed phrase, private key or verification code. Always review the address, network and request details before transferring, signing or approving.

Signature Requests

A signature proves that an account agrees to a message or on-chain action. The important part is understanding the request, not merely recognizing the pop-up.

What a message signature can represent

What a message signature can represent is a distinct part of understanding Signature Requests.

Within Signature Requests, what a message signature can represent should not be treated as an isolated concept. Real actions often involve an account, a selected network, on-chain state and an explicit user decision. A reliable approach is to define the task first and then review every input that can change the outcome. A familiar interface or a sense of urgency is not a reason to approve a request you cannot explain.

When reviewing what a message signature can represent, prefer information that can be independently checked. Network names, addresses, contract identifiers, transaction hashes and block-explorer records are usually more useful than screenshots or messages from third parties. A wallet can surface these details, but users still need to distinguish between being connected, signing a message, granting an approval and seeing a confirmed transaction.

A practical routine is to divide the process into before, during and after. Before the action, verify the source and environment. During confirmation, read the network, address, amount, permissions or contract target. Afterward, verify the result on-chain. This makes it easier to diagnose pending transactions, display issues or DApp state mismatches without guessing.

Practical check

  • Confirm that the action matches the goal of What a message signature can represent
  • Never provide a seed phrase, private key or verification code to anyone
  • Stop when a signature, approval or address change cannot be explained

How a transaction signature can change on-chain state

How a transaction signature can change on-chain state is a distinct part of understanding Signature Requests.

When reviewing how a transaction signature can change on-chain state, prefer information that can be independently checked. Network names, addresses, contract identifiers, transaction hashes and block-explorer records are usually more useful than screenshots or messages from third parties. A wallet can surface these details, but users still need to distinguish between being connected, signing a message, granting an approval and seeing a confirmed transaction.

A practical routine is to divide the process into before, during and after. Before the action, verify the source and environment. During confirmation, read the network, address, amount, permissions or contract target. Afterward, verify the result on-chain. This makes it easier to diagnose pending transactions, display issues or DApp state mismatches without guessing.

Within Signature Requests, how a transaction signature can change on-chain state should not be treated as an isolated concept. Real actions often involve an account, a selected network, on-chain state and an explicit user decision. A reliable approach is to define the task first and then review every input that can change the outcome. A familiar interface or a sense of urgency is not a reason to approve a request you cannot explain.

Practical check

  • Confirm that the action matches the goal of How a transaction signature can change on-chain state
  • Never provide a seed phrase, private key or verification code to anyone
  • Stop when a signature, approval or address change cannot be explained

What to do with a signature request you do not understand

What to do with a signature request you do not understand is a distinct part of understanding Signature Requests.

A practical routine is to divide the process into before, during and after. Before the action, verify the source and environment. During confirmation, read the network, address, amount, permissions or contract target. Afterward, verify the result on-chain. This makes it easier to diagnose pending transactions, display issues or DApp state mismatches without guessing.

Within Signature Requests, what to do with a signature request you do not understand should not be treated as an isolated concept. Real actions often involve an account, a selected network, on-chain state and an explicit user decision. A reliable approach is to define the task first and then review every input that can change the outcome. A familiar interface or a sense of urgency is not a reason to approve a request you cannot explain.

When reviewing what to do with a signature request you do not understand, prefer information that can be independently checked. Network names, addresses, contract identifiers, transaction hashes and block-explorer records are usually more useful than screenshots or messages from third parties. A wallet can surface these details, but users still need to distinguish between being connected, signing a message, granting an approval and seeing a confirmed transaction.

Practical check

  • Confirm that the action matches the goal of What to do with a signature request you do not understand
  • Never provide a seed phrase, private key or verification code to anyone
  • Stop when a signature, approval or address change cannot be explained

Why malicious signatures are difficult to undo afterward

Why malicious signatures are difficult to undo afterward is a distinct part of understanding Signature Requests.

Within Signature Requests, why malicious signatures are difficult to undo afterward should not be treated as an isolated concept. Real actions often involve an account, a selected network, on-chain state and an explicit user decision. A reliable approach is to define the task first and then review every input that can change the outcome. A familiar interface or a sense of urgency is not a reason to approve a request you cannot explain.

When reviewing why malicious signatures are difficult to undo afterward, prefer information that can be independently checked. Network names, addresses, contract identifiers, transaction hashes and block-explorer records are usually more useful than screenshots or messages from third parties. A wallet can surface these details, but users still need to distinguish between being connected, signing a message, granting an approval and seeing a confirmed transaction.

A practical routine is to divide the process into before, during and after. Before the action, verify the source and environment. During confirmation, read the network, address, amount, permissions or contract target. Afterward, verify the result on-chain. This makes it easier to diagnose pending transactions, display issues or DApp state mismatches without guessing.

Practical check

  • Confirm that the action matches the goal of Why malicious signatures are difficult to undo afterward
  • Never provide a seed phrase, private key or verification code to anyone
  • Stop when a signature, approval or address change cannot be explained
Seed phrases and private keys remain under the user’s control; official staff will not ask for them. On-chain transactions usually cannot be reversed by a wallet alone, and third-party DApps and smart contracts may carry risk.

Continue with imtoken

Start with wallet, network and security knowledge before moving into on-chain actions.

Download imtoken